Iain’s Blog

Hi,

Things have been done and are under way that may help in some small way show this whole 5 years to be what it is. Try not to hang around!

But the really good news is all the e-mails, texts etc you have been sending in, some of the things you suggest are downright naughty! I like them though.

It really is sad though so many of you are now totally faithless in the system. They don’t care you feel that way from what I have seen. But the good news again…is that you cared to send your messages thats worth more than all the experts fee’s put together…which is  alot!

Other good news is my brother in law past out of the Royal Air Force the othe day, reminded me of the RAF motto ‘through endeavour to the stars’…never thought it would be this appropriate! Rob looked very smart, and was in an intake with 13 potential RAF Police Officers. Took me back!

Anyway thank you, your support is what makes us strong!  

Other good news I have taught our dog to poo on command I say the words ‘cps experts’ and she won’t stop, she growls too when I say that…can’t think why.

Anyway bed is calling, another day, another chapter.

Hi,

Had a quick run through. The brief version seems to be

Keran lovely person.

Lots of CPS experts mentioned…ours not rated. For ‘new experts’ to become accepted you have to wait for the CPS ones to die? Dr Leesthma has been around for years, still not long enough to impress. In my view he was much more interesting than the others (aren’t the judges meant to put themselves in the place of the jurors, I bet they may have thought differently if they had seen more).

The Jurors got a mention the Appeal court lay the decision on Keran being a nasty piece of work to them. Not the fact the likes of certain experts can say it and sew the seeds.

I like the line (word to effect) Keran chose not to do certain things at trial - funny I remember her being advised, funny how these things never seem to work out, but its the appelants fault….I did like the making Keran sign for one decision ’she’ made…hmmm, some people really should have apologised, or helped rectify what did and didn’t happen.

And finally  

Paperwork came in nice coloured folders.

                                                                                                 The End

Iain’s summing up

Why can’t we look more closely at certain witness statements? Stuff expert ones that’s just an unproven theory…

Why can’t we look at the statements of the witnesses of the people present at the time of the alleged incidents - oh yes cos they were NEVER taken. She wasn’t alone with Maeve, but NOBODY took the statements….imagine if they said there was nothing wrong, no shaking heavy or light had ever taken place? Blimey…my wife wouldn’t have gone to prison.

Why can’t we ask the witness who came off the stand and said ‘oh my God I have blown it, I need to change my story’. The truth is the truth a story is….exactly that.

Why are certain experts okay? Stoodley wasn’t okay in the Ben Butler case, but he is in ours? Wonder how Mr Stoodley feels I do recall he slated other experts for not being current - what was it they said about you…

When are people going to realise that certain experts have been a bit wide of the mark, may not be trained, may say different things in different cases…not long

What about the fact Maeve had been ill for a long time, way before Keran looked after her, even Maeve’s Gran said that on the stand (re illness) before being whisked off.

What happened to innocent until proven guilty, once the experts said it was suspicious the Police looked no where else. Its a highly dodgy debate, why rely on that alone. Look at ‘other’ statements.

Why didn’t the experts SEEK clarification of what Keran had meant by ‘whizzing’. Assume = ass u me, thats exactly what they have done. By not checking they have assumed, so arrogant they didn’t ask. What happened to investigations?

Why didn’t they mention a serving Police Officer helped revive Maeve on the second collapse?

Why wasn’t questions asked about Maeves routine being different the night before she was brought to our home for the last time?

Something still stinks, but all those that have been responsible, from poor investigations or none, to poor avice or no advice, to stitching up, to those who know more - yet say nothing (allowing my children to be abused) I am sure you can sleep safe knowing that you have sent lots of people to prison and had their kids taken away, or just a woman who did the right thing in her community and her children.

What she did, she did for free, never took pieces of silver for her efforts (excluding the childminding). Some of you could learn a bit from her. She is so much stronger than you, she has grown, she has still stayed true to herself on the whole and helped some of the other women in prison where she could. Given the choice a CPS expert or a convicted prisoner, I would take the prisoner everytime, you can trust the girls more. 

I do Archery by the way not Fencing, sorry that should read Fence sitting. I intend to launch a few arrows off very soon. I intend not to miss. I missed the point with the court of appeal, won’t make the mistake again, if you can’t/won’t correct the mistakes/omissions. Then theres not much point.

I can really understand and empathise with those who take the law into their own hands the system encourages it as the system is so unfair, slow, corrupt (protect our own), unfair…yeah I know it’s twice, but it has been two bites and it still doesn’t clear it up.

If you want a theory, and I am not an expert, but the more vocal the appeal, the more you have to wait, the quieter, the easier it is to allow it through as no one will notice, so there won’t be more appeals on the back of it.

Hmmm

Problem is the Emperor is still being allowed to prance about in his ‘new clothes’.

I will still be there though shouting theres nothing to his ‘clothing’ until the rest of you catch up…

Iain

p.s.

Tips next time on how not to let it get personal when you are a professional, and how to avoid wanting to win at any cost, to beat the nasty people you are persecuting, includes no matter how low you have to go, even down to the downright unhygienic. This will be available in paper back soon.

Hi,

By now most of you may have heard the 3 Judges of the Appeal, they said ‘No’.

Logically thinking folks, its not a surprise on many levels. Some I will discuss. The biggest issue is of course they are not allowed to clear up the ‘issues’ (and I am being polite there) from the Trial.

That’s actually where I will leave that for the mo.

I have just read a new medical report, and there are other measures being launched today and other issues being tackled by others totally independently that will have an impact on our case and maybe many others. Maybe we will have to follow our Canadian Cousins with a huge enquiry when this breaks?

I am using the example of Al Capone now, to show you follow the rules and it gets you no where, so there’s more than one way to catch a bully, skin a cat whatever you want to word it as.

Watch this space…

Finally the Royal Courts of Justice is a beautiful building but some may not know it cost a fortune to build, think Millenium Dome. There was a huge outcry at the time in some quarters at how much was spent.

The reason I mention that if you spend lots of money, you can build anything. Including a case where there is NO evidence.

They pay,    they say,          they win…..(or do they) 

CPS             EXPERTS

Hi,

Found this site a new one on me, but when I read some of the material on it, how true it was, wish we had found it 5 years ago!

Assumptions Become Convictions
Once accused, in an “excess of zeal” and a rush to condemn, an accusation leads almost directly to a conviction unless a falsely accused person acts aggressively to protect themselves without being intimidated, which is easier said than done. Medical investigation becomes almost non-existent because abuse is assumed, and legal investigation is geared towards proving guilt. Sometimes doctors, social services, law enforcement and court officers who appoint themselves judge and jury before the fact may twist or fabricate evidence or withhold it to insure a conviction. So, unless innocent caretakers examine the documents in their own cases for error, fraud or unproven assumptions and take a strong, aggressive stand against the kind of coercion and intimidation used against them, they are often railroaded into prison simply because the symptoms were found, without any supporting evidence that they caused non-accidental injuries other than being the last person with the infant. The best call in cases where SBS is diagnosed, whether that term is used or not, is to loudly demand, “WHERE ARE THE NECK INJURIES?”

Also, A WORD OF ADVICE: Take a polygraph exam. If you are innocent of abuse, you won’t fail. Polygraph exams react to DECEPTION, not nervousness, regret, remorse, fear, or other kinds of emotional distress and pain. Tell the truth. If you are honest, the worst that can happen at the hands of a competent examiner is that one who is trying to accommodate the prosecution may say the results are “inconclusive”. Then, you have a more trust worthy examiner look at the readings for interpretation. Privately requested exams are kept private. You do with the results what you want, but they should go to doctors, law enforcement, social services and the prosecutor right up front, and the media for certain.

Assist the attorney with your case. Attorneys prepare case law and legal arguments based on the legal charges against their clients but they rarely study the actual cases carefully or do any research of the type you need, unless they specialize in these cases and have acquired medical expertise concerning alternative causes. As shocking as it sounds, doctors are not above lying and falsifying medical reports to make certain caretakers are blamed, either out of ignorance or to protect themselves. Law enforcement investigators notoriously falsify reports and give perjured testimony in court to assure convictions. There is even a word for this …”testilying”.

No Differential Diagnosis Means No Defense and No Justice
When comatose or unresponsive infants are brought to the ER and symptoms long held to be diagnostic of SBS are found, without documented evidence of accidental injury or disease, abuse is assumed. Doctors, social services and the criminal justice system, engorged with an “excess of zeal,” rush to accuse, often cutting corners–failing or refusing to do “DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS”, to eliminate other causes of the same symptoms. Once an accusation or voiced suspicion of child abuse is uttered, investigation by law enforcement is geared to proving abuse, not disproving it, symptoms are interpreted in terms of inflicted injury, prosecutors jump on the band wagon, defense attorneys fail to research their cases with due diligence and push for plea bargains or yield to certain convictions, and “due process” by the criminal justice system gets lost in the shuffle.

Threats of certain conviction based on symptoms alone (which have other causes) with long prison sentences for those who insist on going to trial usually lead to plea bargains forged from hopelessness and despair. Pleas, in turn, are used as “proof” of guilt in other similar cases which lack supporting science and forensic evidence of “criminal intent”.